| From: | Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Marko Tiikkaja <marko(at)joh(dot)to>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add numeric_trim(numeric) |
| Date: | 2016-01-06 23:51:32 |
| Message-ID: | CAEZATCV+paeA9iXyjv9AvNxd7fccyqRg0-4J3+hOWLUVpLUCtQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 6 January 2016 at 20:09, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 6, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> It seems like a useful function to have, but perhaps it should just be
>> called trim() rather than numeric_trim(), for consistency with the
>> names of the other numeric functions, which don't start with
>> "numeric_".
>
> That wouldn't work in this case, because we have hard-coded parser
> productions for TRIM().
>
Ah. Good point.
Pity -- I would have liked a nice short name for this, in a similar
vein to the existing numeric functions.
Regards,
Dean
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-01-06 23:51:53 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |
| Previous Message | Jim Nasby | 2016-01-06 23:42:35 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |