Re: Binary operators for cubes

On Fri, 4 Jul 2025 at 13:07, Kirill Panin <kipanin(at)edu(dot)hse(dot)ru> wrote:
>
> Thanks for your response.
> Do you think it makes sense to disallow cube+cube operations and only
> allow cube+point or point+point instead? Dot and cross products would be
> similarly only defined for point+point if someone were to implement them.
> I'll submit a v2 if this is an acceptable solution.
>

Having thought about this a little more, I'm not convinced that doing
any of this is a good idea.

The problem is a cube is not a vector, and adding more functions or
operators to try to make it behave like one seems to be going in the
wrong direction. Perhaps it would help to re-examine the use cases,
and whether using the cube extension is the right thing in the first
place.

Regards,
Dean