Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of)
Date: 2012-05-31 15:26:48
Message-ID: CAEYLb_XfmkYna=onAPr1z6ipeU9DG1=OfGjwWnoDovZi_5iFqQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 31 May 2012 16:23, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> In what way is it possibly destabilising?
>
> I'm prepared to believe that it only affects performance, but it could
> be destabilizing to that.  It needs proper review and testing, and the
> next CF is the right environment for that to happen.

It couldn't possibly be as destabilising to performance as
commit_delay was in 9.1.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Claudio Freire 2012-05-31 15:33:52 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-05-31 15:25:37 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and thousands of schemas