On 29 January 2012 21:19, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Is it really that much of a problem to create a new severity level for
> this stuff?
I should probably have quoted this refinement, which was part of the
discussion that I originally quoted Robert from:
On 24 November 2011 16:55, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of jue nov 24 13:14:38 -0300 2011:
>> What I think we want to distinguish between is things that are
>> PEBKAC/GIGO, and everything else. In other words, if a particular
>> error message can be caused by typing something stupid, unexpected,
>> erroneous, or whatever into psql, it's just an error. But if no
>> input, however misguided, should ever cause that symptom, then it's, I
>> don't know what the terminology should be, say, a "severe error".
I'm strongly in favour of this.
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Peter Geoghegan||Date: 2012-01-29 22:42:35|
|Subject: Silly typo in proc.h|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2012-01-29 21:33:13|
|Subject: Re: BUG #6416: Expression index not used with UNION ALL queries |