| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) |
| Date: | 2012-06-28 18:58:15 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_Ws+cAixXv0GDgH=+rtjyzWqgp-g7nshy7V=3pG22NbpQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 28 June 2012 19:55, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:18 PM, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>> You think it will confuse users less if we start telling them to use
>> something that we have a very long history of telling them not to use?
>
> I don't buy this line of reasoning at all. If we're going to rename
> the GUC, it should be for accuracy, not PR value. If we start
> renaming something every time we improve it, we're going to go nuts.
> We improved lots of things in 9.2; they didn't all get renamed.
That is a false equivalence, and you know it.
Who said anything about PR value? I'm concerned with not confusing users.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2012-06-28 19:00:06 | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2012-06-28 18:55:29 | Re: Uh, I change my mind about commit_delay + commit_siblings (sort of) |