Re: enhanced error fields

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: enhanced error fields
Date: 2012-07-23 14:37:56
Message-ID: CAEYLb_Vaz-cM2CLOQ73WMSc-KOCbK1zhRjp2oFTY-gWnhFLOnQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 23 July 2012 15:23, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> It seems clear that it's not reasonable to expect any more review to
> be done here this CommitFest, given that the changes from reviews
> already made haven't been incorporated into the patch. Therefore, I'm
> going to mark this one Returned with Feedback.

I agree that that's the right thing to do at this point.

--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Janes 2012-07-23 15:02:51 Re: Checkpointer split has broken things dramatically (was Re: DELETE vs TRUNCATE explanation)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2012-07-23 14:29:06 Re: 9.2 release schedule