Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW locklevel

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(dot)geoghegan86(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW locklevel
Date: 2013-03-07 17:36:29
Message-ID: CAEYLb_V=3k4fqX7F_c70w=5eWdzB2A6sz1JNmJjcYcs+inhGuA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

On 7 March 2013 09:30, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> This fact imo reduces the usability of the matviews features as it
> stands atm considerably. I think we should be very careful not to
> advocate its existance much and document very clearly that its work in
> progress.

+1

--
Regards,
Peter Geoghegan

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-03-07 17:55:39 Re: REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW locklevel
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-03-07 17:30:43 REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW locklevel

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2013-03-07 17:42:48 Re: odd behavior in materialized view
Previous Message Andres Freund 2013-03-07 17:30:43 REFRESH MATERIALIZED VIEW locklevel