| From: | Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, "w^3" <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: 9.2beta web issues |
| Date: | 2012-07-06 18:37:44 |
| Message-ID: | CAEYLb_Uycpj6h1f5_1dXquk1c2XOVeSYDaPtKHHWibQbOpXD8w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
On 6 July 2012 19:23, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
> On 07/06/2012 12:44 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> yeah same goes for the (imho completely failed) experiment of using
> google docs(...) for collecting test results as recommended on
> https://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/HowToBetaTest (which is linked to from
> the main site on http://www.postgresql.org/developer/alpha/)
>
> I think we should completely drop all references to the google docs
> thingy and the -testers list there and redirect people simply to -bugs
> and/or hackers.
+1.
I'm not necessarily opposed to have a web interface, or even a
full-blown bug tracker, but having just read the wiki page about beta
testing, it sort of sounds like this was instituted as an official
policy. That seems like a questionable way to present it to me,
because I wasn't even aware that there was a google form.
--
Peter Geoghegan http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Scott Mead | 2012-07-07 16:26:32 | Linux Downloads page change |
| Previous Message | Stefan Kaltenbrunner | 2012-07-06 18:23:32 | Re: 9.2beta web issues |