Re: Our poll() based WaitLatch implementation is broken

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Our poll() based WaitLatch implementation is broken
Date: 2012-01-15 08:25:46
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UpKveDsjeXoweCQuOZH7Kk4O9QbaHTwbmBMqiR9UdP7w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 15 January 2012 07:26, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Build Postgres master, on Linux or another platform that will use the
> poll() implementation rather than the older select(). Send the
> Postmaster SIGKILL. Observe that the WAL Writer lives on, representing
> a denial of service as it stays attached to shared memory, busy
> waiting (evident from the fact that it quickly leaks memory).

Correction: The CPU usage % approaches 100.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2012-01-15 08:37:30 Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)
Previous Message Greg Smith 2012-01-15 08:24:15 Vacuum rate limit in KBps