Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)
Date: 2012-01-15 08:37:30
Message-ID: 4F12904A.4000700@2ndQuadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 01/15/2012 03:17 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
> And FWIW, I'd find it a lot more useful for the CF app to have the
> ability to post *reviews* in it, that would end up being properly
> threaded.

Next you'll be saying we should have some sort of web application to
help with the whole review process, show the work on an integrated sort
of Review Board or something. What crazy talk.

My contribution toward patch review ease for this week is that peg is
quite a bit smarter about referring to the correct part of the origin
git repo now, when you've been working on a branch for a while then
create a new one: https://github.com/gregs1104/peg

Last week's was that I confirmed that on a Mac using Homebrew for
package management, after "brew install postgresql" to get the
dependencies in, you can then use peg to setup a PostgreSQL in your home
directory for patch testing or development. Works fine out of the box,
you just won't have things like all the PLs installed.

Yes, I am aware I'm going at this bottom-up.

--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2012-01-15 08:45:25 Re: automating CF submissions (was xlog location arithmetic)
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-01-15 08:25:46 Re: Our poll() based WaitLatch implementation is broken