Re: Group commit, revised

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Group commit, revised
Date: 2012-01-21 03:37:22
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UjzGO9axc7x-ONeCy8HdqfDCTo2bnAxCMQnGbPwb+Tsg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 21 January 2012 03:13, Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> I have taken the time to re-run the benchmark and update the wiki with
> that new information - I'd call it a draw.

On second though, the occasional latency spikes that we see with my
patch (which uses the poll() based latch in the run that is
benchmarked) might be significant - difficult to say. The averages are
about the same though.

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2012-01-21 05:26:36 Re: WIP: index support for regexp search
Previous Message Peter Geoghegan 2012-01-21 03:13:56 Re: Group commit, revised