Re: pgsql: Make WaitLatch's WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH result trustworthy; simplif

From: Peter Geoghegan <peter(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Make WaitLatch's WL_POSTMASTER_DEATH result trustworthy; simplif
Date: 2012-05-10 21:22:37
Message-ID: CAEYLb_UQKeGQpPvHkyPDYaMCyy-YM0F1XYSFrguxTbsgW7bhNg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On 10 May 2012 19:35, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Remove weasel wording about falsely-set result bits from
> WaitLatch's API contract.

Aren't those weasel words still applicable to the case where sock !=
PGINVALID_SOCKET ?

--
Peter Geoghegan       http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training and Services

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2012-05-10 21:26:46 pgsql: Temporarily revert stats collector latch changes so we can ship
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2012-05-10 20:50:49 pgsql: Merge visibility map crash-safety into index-only scan release n