Re: Why is parula failing?

From: Robins Tharakan <tharakan(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Tharakan, Robins" <tharar(at)amazon(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why is parula failing?
Date: 2024-04-10 01:13:23
Message-ID: CAEP4nAwdGypgDVTRftOaA52vJa8g899ae=cWs1Z2kJ43-J1Mgg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, 10 Apr 2024 at 10:24, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Master failed today for the first time since the compiler upgrade.
> Again reltuples == 48.

From the buildfarm members page, parula seems to be the only aarch64 + gcc
13.2
combination today, and then I suspect whether this is about gcc v13.2
maturity on aarch64?

I'll try to upgrade one of the other aarch64s I have (massasauga or
snakefly) and
see if this is more about gcc 13.2 maturity on this architecture.
-
robins

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2024-04-10 01:24:43 Re: Improve eviction algorithm in ReorderBuffer
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-04-10 00:55:36 Re: Speed up clean meson builds by ~25%