Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements

From: Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Sami Imseih <samimseih(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: queryId constant squashing does not support prepared statements
Date: 2025-05-09 06:48:35
Message-ID: CAEG8a3L0QFpXRMmZRbDMBbwfruzTJmdwWKuXzd_fb+572Twctw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, May 9, 2025 at 1:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>
> On Fri, May 09, 2025 at 11:05:43AM +0800, Junwang Zhao wrote:
> > Why not a location and a length, it should be more natural, it
> > seems we use this convention in some existing nodes, like
> > RawStmt, InsertStmt etc.
>
> These are new concepts as of Postgres 18 (aka only on HEAD), chosen
> mainly to match with the internals of pg_stat_statements as far as I
> recall. Doing the same here would not hurt, but it may be better
> depending on the cases to rely on a start/end.

ISTM that for string manipulation, start_pos/length are more appropriate,
start/end are often better suited for iterator use, where start refers to the
first element and end marks the position one past the last element.

Just my opinion, I can live with either way though.

> I suspect that
> switching from one to the other should not change much the internal
> squashing logic.

Yeah, not much difference, one can easily be computed from the other.

> --
> Michael

--
Regards
Junwang Zhao

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2025-05-09 06:58:42 Re: Support for runtime parameters in injection points, for AIO tests
Previous Message Heikki Linnakangas 2025-05-09 06:37:58 Re: pgsql: Make cancel request keys longer