From: | Junwang Zhao <zhjwpku(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> |
Cc: | Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au>, Jelte Fennema-Nio <postgres(at)jeltef(dot)nl>, pgsql-hackers mailing list <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>, Przemysław Sztoch <przemyslaw(at)sztoch(dot)pl>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <nik(at)postgres(dot)ai>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nick Babadzhanian <pgnickb(at)gmail(dot)com>, Mat Arye <mat(at)timescaledb(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Kyzer Davis (kydavis)" <kydavis(at)cisco(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "brad(at)peabody(dot)io" <brad(at)peabody(dot)io>, Kirk Wolak <wolakk(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: UUID v7 |
Date: | 2024-01-30 10:33:21 |
Message-ID: | CAEG8a3JUgkY3EMp393kJ+bcye8q=VHfQDTQz7Ci-moNVjhPLZA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Andrey,
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 5:56 PM Andrey M. Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 30 Jan 2024, at 12:28, Sergey Prokhorenko <sergeyprokhorenko(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)au> wrote:
> >
> >
> > I think this phrase is outdated: "This function can optionally accept a timestamp used instead of current time.
> > This allows implementation of k-way sotable identifiers.”
> Fixed.
>
> > This phrase is wrong: "Both functions return a version 4 (random) UUID.”
> This applies to functions gen_random_uuid() and uuidv4().
> >
> > For this phrase the reason is unclear and the phrase is most likely incorrect:
> > if large batches of UUIDs are generated at the
> > + same time it's possible that some UUIDs will store a time that is slightly later
> > + than their actual generation time
>
> I’ve rewritten this phrase, hope it’s more clear now.
>
>
> Best regards, Andrey Borodin.
+Datum
+uuid_extract_var(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
+{
+ pg_uuid_t *uuid = PG_GETARG_UUID_P(0);
+ uint16_t result;
+ result = uuid->data[8] >> 6;
+
+ PG_RETURN_UINT16(result);
+}
\ No newline at end of file
It's always good to add a newline at the end of a source file, though
this might be nitpicky.
--
Regards
Junwang Zhao
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | shveta malik | 2024-01-30 10:36:10 | Re: Synchronizing slots from primary to standby |
Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2024-01-30 10:31:17 | Re: why there is not VACUUM FULL CONCURRENTLY? |