Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations

From: Bernice Southey <bernice(dot)southey(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Jim Jones <jim(dot)jones(at)uni-muenster(dot)de>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations
Date: 2025-11-22 18:20:27
Message-ID: CAEDh4nzOtPrpqzh8mkbthP=4UNNSaj4mHTjHZ7c+fLEikfM2fQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> No, that's not part of the proposal. The one case in which we'd
> complain (at an error level TBD) is if a temp table is used to
> define an old-style function's argument or result type
Thank you, I see I was being an idiot.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2025-11-22 18:35:27 Re: another autovacuum scheduling thread
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-11-22 18:04:21 Re: Add notification on BEGIN ATOMIC SQL functions using temp relations