Bernice Southey <bernice(dot)southey(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I went through the history and it seemed to me the repeat rewrite was
> accidental because of the two ways this method can recurse.
I mean the repeat rewrite of the cteList was accidental, not the
repeat rewrite of views. I couldn't think why a view would mean a
cteList needed re-rewriting, but I know very little about view rules.