Re: vacuumlo

From: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>
To: Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Laurenz Albe <laurenz(dot)albe(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Ian Dauncey <Ian(dot)Dauncey(at)bankzero(dot)co(dot)za>, "pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-admin(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: vacuumlo
Date: 2021-09-02 07:33:20
Message-ID: CAECtzeXEiLu1j2UXPFnZmU3sVKuGH5eWb9Z5MxhhB+Stq-AmxQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin pgsql-general

Le jeu. 2 sept. 2021 à 07:11, Atul Kumar <akumar14871(at)gmail(dot)com> a écrit :

> Hi,
>
> Don’t you think it as a drawback of postgres that such temporary files
> don’t get deleted automatically once the transaction gets committed or
> rolled back .
>
>
They are automatically removed in case of a proper commit or rollback. They
aren't in case of a crash.

Could you suggest a good permanent solution for such case.
>
>
You should try https://github.com/bdrouvot/pg_orphaned to find the list of
orphaned files. It does a pretty good job at it.

--
Guillaume.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2021-09-02 07:50:52 Re: Estimating HugePages Requirements?
Previous Message Shaish Guni 2021-09-02 05:13:56 Re: vacuumlo

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kyotaro Horiguchi 2021-09-02 08:08:19 Re: oldest WAL files not removed
Previous Message o.lepretre 2021-09-02 06:21:37 RE: oldest WAL files not removed