| From: | Jan Chochol <jan(dot)chochol(at)gooddata(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Fix order of steps in DISCARD ALL documentation |
| Date: | 2019-06-11 18:47:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAEASf_272L-ua-yX0wJX2Z7Zt_XVvtYj0pdQ1q-Xrx6XxHOiVQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Great, thanks!
On Tue, Jun 11, 2019 at 6:24 PM Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On 2019-May-27, Jan Chochol wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > When investigating behavior of "DISCARD ALL", I found that order of
> > steps of equivalent sequence in documentation is not updated with
> > changes in code.
>
> Pushed. I noticed that DISCARD TEMP and DISCARD SEQUENCES appeared in
> the opposite order, too.
>
> --
> Álvaro Herrera https://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
> PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-06-11 19:03:56 | Re: Is it safe to ignore the return value of SPI_finish and SPI_execute? |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2019-06-11 18:36:50 | Re: Minimal logical decoding on standbys |