Re: pg_stat_replication docs incomplete for logical replication

From: Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_stat_replication docs incomplete for logical replication
Date: 2026-06-18 04:26:34
Message-ID: CAE9k0PmcUFZu4TW0+z=uf3-7T5y8ET4MBi_B8AWGzzZ6zUAckw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hi,

On Thu, Jun 18, 2026 at 4:52 AM Peter Smith <smithpb2250(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> The latest patch LGTM regarding the content.
>
> But, there were some trivial issues.
>
> ======
>
> 1.
> The patch name did not change. The 2nd patch was still called 0001?
>
> ~~~
>
> 2.
> + <para>
> + The <structname>pg_stat_replication</structname> view will contain one row
> + per WAL sender process, showing statistics about replication to that
> ... etc.
>
> Paragraph text is sometimes indented 1 space too many in the SGML file.
> AFAIK, text normally is aligned with the "p" of <para>.
>

Thanks for your feedback. The attached patch addresses the alignment
issue and has been tagged as v3. The two preceding patches, though
untagged, can be considered v1 and v2 respectively.

Please have a look and let me know for any further changes.

--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v3-0001-doc-clarify-pg_stat_replication-view-for-logical-rep.patch application/octet-stream 5.8 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Michael Paquier 2026-06-18 04:37:34 Re: Unexpected behavior after OOM errors
Previous Message Rahila Syed 2026-06-18 04:19:55 Re: Fwd: dsm_registry: Add detach and destroy features