| From: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ajin Cherian <itsajin(at)gmail(dot)com>, SATYANARAYANA NARLAPURAM <satyanarlapuram(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: synchronized_standby_slots behavior inconsistent with quorum-based synchronous replication |
| Date: | 2026-06-08 06:08:48 |
| Message-ID: | CAE9k0PmOURa4Yi3sYFb6PG7PuJGi9zBd9nAcJ3A5-_N_qn8xew@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
On Fri, Jun 5, 2026 at 3:32 PM shveta malik <shveta(dot)malik(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2026 at 2:57 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > So my preferred behavior would be:
> >
> > 1) duplicate names: normalize, do not error
> > 2) after normalization, if num_sync > unique_slots: error immediately
> >
>
> Thanks for tha pathces. I have attached a patch (txt file) with a few
> trivial changes, take it if you find the changes acceptable.
>
Thanks, I will review it and share my feedback.
--
With Regards,
Ashutosh Sharma.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | shveta malik | 2026-06-08 06:12:50 | Re: Proposal: Conflict log history table for Logical Replication |
| Previous Message | Lukas Fittl | 2026-06-08 06:08:13 | Re: RFC: Logging plan of the running query |