| From: | Alexandre Felipe <o(dot)alexandre(dot)felipe(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dhruv Aron <dhruv(dot)aron(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Restructured Shared Buffer Hash Table |
| Date: | 2026-09-21 20:51:05 |
| Message-ID: | CAE8JnxNGtaKUs9ZqkcPhWcEJ1RFfGZHJOAqXiqTGQzCe5gv97g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 4:58 PM Alexandre Felipe <
o(dot)alexandre(dot)felipe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2026 at 4:13 PM Dhruv Aron <dhruv(dot)aron(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just logged into commitfest for the first time, perhaps that's why.
>> Can you try again?
>>
>
> Created, it will be good to see how it behaves in different environments.
>
The CFBot finished, it failed in three environments
https://github.com/postgres/postgres-cfbot/actions/runs/35622455487/job/106409000471
All during the same test (recovery/027_stream_regress) that I pointed out
above to
be the best to detect issues. Coincidence or not it passed on MacOS (the
environment
I tested locally).
Am I being naive with my hopes to make this partially lock-free?
Is there any proof that such an algorithm doesn't exist for this particular
problem?
Kind regards,
Alexandre
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bharath Rupireddy | 2026-09-21 20:59:45 | Re: [PATCH] Release replication slot on error in SQL-callable slot functions |
| Previous Message | Hannu Krosing | 2026-09-21 20:21:03 | Re: Direct TOAST v2, faster, smaller and no migration needed |