From: | Tushar Takate <tushar11(dot)takate(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | ERROR: found xmin 4133102167 from before relfrozenxid 4151440783 |
Date: | 2025-09-12 16:39:19 |
Message-ID: | CAE4W+SLbLuis0B4mVKaCEYmxcf4C0UHo_UQeRF6ScPqfS24j5Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Hi Team,
I was reviewing a couple of community threads in pgsql-bugs and
pgsql-general, however, I was unable to determine whether this is a bug or
actual corruption.
*Details as below *
PostgreSQL version: 15.12
Disk type: RAID5
OS: RHEL 8.10
*Error/Issue : *
vacuumdb: error: processing of database "live_order_us_db" failed: ERROR:
found xmin 4133102167 from before relfrozenxid 4151440783
2025-09-11 02:29:58.888 UTC,,,2362287,,68c233e1.240hbf,1,,2025-09-11
02:28:49 UTC,122/46371006,0,ERROR,XX001,"found xmin 4133102167 from before
relfrozenxid 4151440783",,,,,"while scanning block 5821149 offset 5 of
relation ""public.order""
2025-09-11 02:40:50.361 UTC,"prod_user_ap","live_order_us_db",2375672,"
127.0.0.1:59344",68c2342b.243ff8,4,"VACUUM",2025-09-11 02:30:03
UTC,169/38875732,0,ERROR,XX001,"found xmin 4133102167 from before
relfrozenxid 4151440783",,,,,"while scanning block 5821149 offset 5 of
relation ""public.order""","VACUUM (VERBOSE, ANALYZE)
public.order;",,,"vacuumdb","client backend",,-5528190995457849841
*One more thing/observation we saw in the PostgreSQL logs :*
The following message consistently appeared once a day during the past week
2025-09-10 23:33:14.469 UTC,,,157915,,68c21a46.268fb,3,,2025-09-10 23:31:18
UTC,45/49119328,0,WARNING,01000,"page is not marked all-visible but
visibility map bit is set in relation ""order"" page 5815453",,,,,"while
scanning block 5815453 of relation ""public.order""",,,,"","autovacuum
worker",,0
What specific condition or scenario is triggering this PostgreSQL
error? Can it be classified as a bug? If not, what’s a safe
and efficient way to resolve it without relying on a dump and restore,
particularly for large, mission-critical tables over 200GB?
-
Thanks & Regards,
Tushar.
LinkedIn : Tushar <https://www.linkedin.com/in/tushar-t-93660867/>
My-Blogs : Tushar Blogspot <http://tushar-postgresql.blogspot.in/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Laurenz Albe | 2025-09-12 21:10:34 | Re: ERROR: found xmin 4133102167 from before relfrozenxid 4151440783 |
Previous Message | Stephan Springl | 2025-09-12 13:45:01 | Version 17.6 changed how similar works compared to version 17.5 |