Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?

From: VASUKI M <vasukianand0119(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>
Cc: Ilia Evdokimov <ilya(dot)evdokimov(at)tantorlabs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, Robert Treat <rob(at)xzilla(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?
Date: 2026-01-21 09:56:31
Message-ID: CAE2r8H5TZ7txx95PcutDn_LEP2zcim8P6Wctpzdc+ZgO6JSqdw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Jan 21, 2026 at 3:21 PM Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org> wrote:

> SMART is also a terribly non-descriptive name. How about CHANGED_ONLY?
>

Yeah i agree,as of now i am focusing on concept workflow will change name
in next versions of patch.

Regards,
Vasuki M
C-DAC,Chennai.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2026-01-21 10:05:42 Re: Undefined behavior detected by new clang's ubsan
Previous Message Christoph Berg 2026-01-21 09:50:59 Re: Optional skipping of unchanged relations during ANALYZE?