Re: Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken

From: Emre Hasegeli <emre(at)hasegeli(dot)com>
To: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parallel Bitmap scans a bit broken
Date: 2017-03-16 10:22:02
Message-ID: CAE2gYzxKqXini7KG79HsAbRFfi00rASMN+SiWocb8c__i-vBnA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Are you getting the crash with the same test case?

Yes. Here is the new backtrace:

> * thread #1: tid = 0x51828fd, 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_write_u32_impl(val=0) at generic.h:57, queue = 'com.apple.main-thread', stop reason = EXC_BAD_ACCESS (code=1, address=0x0)
> * frame #0: 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_write_u32_impl(val=0) at generic.h:57 [opt]
> frame #1: 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_init_u32_impl(val_=0) at generic.h:163 [opt]
> frame #2: 0x0000000100caf314 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate [inlined] pg_atomic_init_u32(val=0) + 17 at atomics.h:237 [opt]
> frame #3: 0x0000000100caf303 postgres`tbm_prepare_shared_iterate(tbm=<unavailable>) + 723 at tidbitmap.c:875 [opt]
> frame #4: 0x0000000100c74844 postgres`BitmapHeapNext(node=<unavailable>) + 436 at nodeBitmapHeapscan.c:154 [opt]
> frame #5: 0x0000000100c615b0 postgres`ExecProcNode(node=0x00007fdabf8189f0) + 224 at execProcnode.c:459 [opt]
> frame #6: 0x0000000100c76ca9 postgres`ExecGather [inlined] gather_getnext(gatherstate=<unavailable>) + 520 at nodeGather.c:276 [opt]
> frame #7: 0x0000000100c76aa1 postgres`ExecGather(node=<unavailable>) + 497 at nodeGather.c:212 [opt]
> frame #8: 0x0000000100c61692 postgres`ExecProcNode(node=0x00007fdabf818558) + 450 at execProcnode.c:541 [opt]
> frame #9: 0x0000000100c5cf70 postgres`standard_ExecutorRun [inlined] ExecutePlan(estate=<unavailable>, planstate=<unavailable>, use_parallel_mode=<unavailable>, operation=<unavailable>, numberTuples=0, direction=<unavailable>, dest=<unavailable>) + 29 at execMain.c:1616 [opt]
> frame #10: 0x0000000100c5cf53 postgres`standard_ExecutorRun(queryDesc=<unavailable>, direction=<unavailable>, count=0) + 291 at execMain.c:348 [opt]
> frame #11: 0x0000000100dac0df postgres`PortalRunSelect(portal=0x00007fdac000b240, forward=<unavailable>, count=0, dest=<unavailable>) + 255 at pquery.c:921 [opt]
> frame #12: 0x0000000100dabc84 postgres`PortalRun(portal=0x00007fdac000b240, count=<unavailable>, isTopLevel='\x01', dest=<unavailable>, altdest=<unavailable>, completionTag=<unavailable>) + 500 at pquery.c:762 [opt]
> frame #13: 0x0000000100da989b postgres`PostgresMain + 44 at postgres.c:1101 [opt]
> frame #14: 0x0000000100da986f postgres`PostgresMain(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>, dbname=<unavailable>, username=<unavailable>) + 8927 at postgres.c:4066 [opt]
> frame #15: 0x0000000100d2c113 postgres`PostmasterMain [inlined] BackendRun + 7587 at postmaster.c:4317 [opt]
> frame #16: 0x0000000100d2c0e8 postgres`PostmasterMain [inlined] BackendStartup at postmaster.c:3989 [opt]
> frame #17: 0x0000000100d2c0e8 postgres`PostmasterMain at postmaster.c:1729 [opt]
> frame #18: 0x0000000100d2c0e8 postgres`PostmasterMain(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) + 7544 at postmaster.c:1337 [opt]
> frame #19: 0x0000000100ca528f postgres`main(argc=<unavailable>, argv=<unavailable>) + 1567 at main.c:228 [opt]
> frame #20: 0x00007fffb4e28255 libdyld.dylib`start + 1
> frame #21: 0x00007fffb4e28255 libdyld.dylib`start + 1

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Khandekar 2017-03-16 10:27:44 Re: Parallel Append implementation
Previous Message Nikhil Sontakke 2017-03-16 10:18:18 Re: Speedup twophase transactions