Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?

From: Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?
Date: 2016-12-02 14:33:19
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 1:59 PM Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>

> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > I guess it would make sense to do all of it in 10.0.
> > I'm new here, so not very sure about process. How many commit fests
> could I
> > expect before 10.0 is out (I'm a bit busy at the moment)?
> There are two remaining: 2017-01 and 2017-03:

Sweet, that's plenty of time.
Consider me signed up, probably by 2017-02 or 2017-03. If somebody else
wants to send some patches in this field earlier, please let me know so we
don't duplicate the work.

> > I'd rather have html redirects set up (assuming they are technically
> > possible).
> That makes the most sense, and that would need some coordination with
> the main documentation website to map a new page with the ones from
> the previous versions.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-02 14:51:49 Re: pgsql: Add putenv support for msvcrt from Visual Studio 2013
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-02 14:01:30 Re: [DOCS] monitoring.sgml - clarify length of query text displayed in pg_stat_statements