Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?

From: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: s/xlog/wal/ in tools and function names?
Date: 2016-12-02 13:59:42
Message-ID: CAB7nPqQtTCWoYFZxSwMm2aZf+xk1TK84JfBH7OEUwT=woHQsLQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 8:28 PM, Vladimir Rusinov <vrusinov(at)google(dot)com> wrote:
> I guess it would make sense to do all of it in 10.0.
> I'm new here, so not very sure about process. How many commit fests could I
> expect before 10.0 is out (I'm a bit busy at the moment)?

There are two remaining: 2017-01 and 2017-03: https://commitfest.postgresql.org/

> I'd rather have html redirects set up (assuming they are technically
> possible).

That makes the most sense, and that would need some coordination with
the main documentation website to map a new page with the ones from
the previous versions.
--
Michael

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2016-12-02 14:01:30 Re: [DOCS] monitoring.sgml - clarify length of query text displayed in pg_stat_statements
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-12-02 13:53:33 Re: Tackling JsonPath support