Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2025-12-16 02:48:00
Message-ID: CADzfLwWmURJJ6E+ObzjnS3vam1XbYTgAS9knsr6aFeGENaxq_w@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello!

On Mon, Dec 15, 2025 at 12:31 PM Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de> wrote:
> I've commented them out from the meson/makefile for now.

Thanks!

First version of TAP-based test in attachment. I think we should not
hurry with push - let's make sure it really stable now.

Best regards,
Mikhail.

Attachment Content-Type Size
nocfbot-0001-Preserve-visibility-information-of-the-conc.patch text/plain 32.7 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2025-12-16 03:15:29 RE: [BUG] [PATCH] Allow physical replication slots to recover from archive after invalidation
Previous Message jian he 2025-12-16 02:45:04 Re: create table like including storage parameter