Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Issues with ON CONFLICT UPDATE and REINDEX CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2026-01-26 01:09:38
Message-ID: CADzfLwWeXp1nGMA1V42DvA6OiphBWPQ6Vr7uAXzAU0h8XP8QOQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Another approach - put information about parents into
> - I can rebuild the patch that way.
Into relcache, sorry.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Rowley 2026-01-26 01:32:50 Re: unnecessary executor overheads around seqscans
Previous Message Neil Chen 2026-01-26 00:41:34 Re: [PATCH] Avoid potential NULL dereference in LIKE/ILIKE with C locale