Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command
Date: 2025-11-09 22:51:51
Message-ID: CADzfLwWTFNEDV9vAgLm=dGVi3kBb_p925U1YYG_pX3ty6W6LaA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello!

нд, 9 ліс 2025, 23:34 карыстальнік Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
напісаў:

> It is already possible to achieve that, isn't it? One can define
> side-by-side twice INJECTION_POINT(), then assign a different callback
> to each with a strict control of the execution order.
>

Yes, possible. But the idea is to avoid weird two INJECTION_POINT in a
row...

Hm, random idea - make INJECTION_POINT to actually define few injection
points: pre-x, x, post-x.

Best regards,
Mikhail.

>

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2025-11-09 22:59:19 Re: DOCS: What SGML markup to use for user objects like tables, columns, etc?
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2025-11-09 22:34:21 Re: isolation tester limitation in case of multiple injection points in a single command