Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>
Cc: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Subject: Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
Date: 2025-08-21 08:43:08
Message-ID: CADzfLwVJtBKX32daO20hJ_6_BWZn9cFPtAwzyzNrT2u7YCd6CA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hello,

Added one more test - for invalid "update_deleted" conflict detection.

Best regards,
Mikhail.

Attachment Content-Type Size
v10-0002-Fix-btree-index-scan-concurrency-issues-with-dir.patch application/octet-stream 10.1 KB
v10-0001-This-patch-introduces-new-injection-points-and-T.patch application/octet-stream 22.1 KB

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu) 2025-08-21 08:54:44 doc patch: correct function name for slot synchronization.
Previous Message Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu) 2025-08-21 08:39:11 RE: Conflict detection for update_deleted in logical replication