Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: "Zhijie Hou (Fujitsu)" <houzj(dot)fnst(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, "Hayato Kuroda (Fujitsu)" <kuroda(dot)hayato(at)fujitsu(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org
Subject: Re: [BUG?] check_exclusion_or_unique_constraint false negative
Date: 2025-10-28 18:06:00
Message-ID: CADzfLwVBN7_xMcCBgh4c2kum_ea=Fd60ZsMJ3_OjUSn+qYDNoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Attachment Content-Type Size
v14-0002-Fix-logical-replication-conflict-detection-durin.patch text/x-patch 4.6 KB
v14-0001-This-patch-introduces-new-injection-points-and-T.patch text/x-patch 26.9 KB

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Mihail Nikalayeu 2025-10-28 18:37:00 Re: Revisiting {CREATE INDEX, REINDEX} CONCURRENTLY improvements
Previous Message Jeff Davis 2025-10-28 17:59:26 Re: C11: should we use char32_t for unicode code points?