Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes

From: Mihail Nikalayeu <mihailnikalayeu(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)kurilemu(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Donghang Lin <donghanglin(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <amborodin86(at)gmail(dot)com>, Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: bt_index_parent_check and concurrently build indexes
Date: 2025-12-04 18:02:39
Message-ID: CADzfLwU3zo_bz7=JZ7h22AEn9uqh-L5oYRmSdhMeXcYy_iw77A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Hi, I pushed this to 17 and up. Thanks!
Thanks!

I'll update my CIC patch then - now it is not required to have any
other patch inbuilt.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2025-12-04 18:15:55 Re: pgsql: Add pg_atomic_unlocked_write_u64
Previous Message Tom Lane 2025-12-04 18:01:57 Re: Something in our JIT code is screwing up PG_PRINTF_ATTRIBUTE