Re: Refactoring on DROP/ALTER SET SCHEMA/ALTER RENAME TO statement

From: Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PgHacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Refactoring on DROP/ALTER SET SCHEMA/ALTER RENAME TO statement
Date: 2011-12-01 13:25:21
Message-ID: CADyhKSXHFAw96XMr=KdxFshW66=R9Kap4J+S+rHNnYVXHpDUoQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

2011/11/30 Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 3:14 PM, Kohei KaiGai <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp> wrote:
>> If we add new properties that required by AlterObjectNamespace, as
>> you suggested, it will allow to reduce number of caller of this routine
>> mechanically with small changes.
>> Should I try this reworking with this way?
>
> Yeah, let's try that for starters, and then see if anything further
> suggests itself.
>
OK. I marked this patch as "Returned with Feedback".
I will try it again.
In the timeframe of this commit-fest, I'll focuse on remaining my
patches and reviewing pgsql-fdw.

Thanks,
--
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alexander Korotkov 2011-12-01 13:32:11 Re: Inverse convertion for pg_mb2wchar
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2011-12-01 12:21:39 Re: Java LISTEN/NOTIFY client library work-around