From: | Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Shams Khan <shams(dot)khan22(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Monitoring Replication on Master/Slave Postgres(9.1) |
Date: | 2012-11-27 08:34:35 |
Message-ID: | CADmi=6NGBEKVQTcDdnPX3DfPf3Y8magKLVi=riZB3JaJRb4vsQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 5:05 PM, Shams Khan <shams(dot)khan22(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I want to know the ways to monitor the replication, whether the master and
> slave server are sync.
On the slave, run "SELECT now() - pg_last_xact_replay_timestamp() AS
time_lag;". That tells you how far behind in time the slave is.
> My question is how do we read these numbers(17A/342A6F78 and 17A/34366C30) I
> never got the same results on both servers. Is that mean slave is not synced
> with master?
With asynchronous replication, the slave will always lag behind the
master. The query I posted above will tell you by how much.
--
Stuart Bishop <stuart(at)stuartbishop(dot)net>
http://www.stuartbishop.net/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Shams Khan | 2012-11-27 09:39:30 | Fwd: Monitoring Replication on Master/Slave Postgres(9.1) |
Previous Message | Shams Khan | 2012-11-27 08:02:58 | Re: Fwd: Monitoring Replication on Master/Slave Postgres(9.1) |