Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>, Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kirill Reshke <reshkekirill(at)gmail(dot)com>, Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, Isaac Morland <isaac(dot)morland(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: CAST(... ON DEFAULT) - WIP build on top of Error-Safe User Functions
Date: 2026-03-27 20:59:49
Message-ID: CADkLM=euzh4v-FK6Tx-yrXfZX4YVd1X5WCpWN7o5=cQsrT7-Yg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 25, 2026 at 9:14 AM jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 24, 2026 at 9:13 PM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org>
> wrote:
> >
> > In patch 0012, I did not apply the changes involving
> > float_*flow_error() in dtof(). These should be considered together
> > with the error handling changes in patch 0018 (about which below).
> >
> > Patch 0004 is probably ok, I just need to study a bit more, since it's
> > a bit different from the other ones.
> >
> > In the comment for patch 0008 you write that supporting soft errors in
> > int4_cash() is not easy. I suppose this is because of the external
> > function call to int8mul()? Maybe that was necessary in ancient
> > times, but int8mul() is nowadays just a fmgr wrapper around
> > pg_mul_s64_overflow(), which you can call directly in int4_cash(), and
> > then it should be easy.
> >
>
> cash_numeric is not easy to refactor safely,
> To do this, we have to refactor (numeric_round, numeric_div), which
> will require refactoring more functions.
> So CoercionErrorSafe_Internal still checks whether the source
> element/base type is MONEYOID.
>

What if we just...didn't? The MONEY has been deprecated since 7.4. If we
simply didn't implement this, and someone attempted to use this cast with
default, what bad would happen?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Melanie Plageman 2026-03-27 21:17:25 Re: Don't synchronously wait for already-in-progress IO in read stream
Previous Message Shlok Kyal 2026-03-27 20:50:57 Re: Skipping schema changes in publication