| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: vacuumdb: add --dry-run |
| Date: | 2025-11-20 22:09:54 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=ejhuvk9TOmYe09kaWdUoCzPci1aYa9+ADOwzP22e1XeA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Nov 20, 2025 at 4:46 PM Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2025 at 07:54:06PM -0500, Corey Huinker wrote:
> > Here's a shopping list of incremental changes. I'm happy with whatever
> > makes the most sense to you.
>
> Here is a v4 patch set. I've made a variety of small changes. I think
> there's some room to bike-shed on the messages we send to the user to
> assure them we're not actually doing anything, but this is roughly what I
> imagined.
>
Everything here looks good to me. I have nothing to add.
I have no objections to, but I am curious about the factors that went into
making dry_run an independent boolean rather than part of vacopts.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie Plageman | 2025-11-20 22:11:34 | Re: Checkpointer write combining |
| Previous Message | Masahiko Sawada | 2025-11-20 22:08:37 | Re: [PATCH] Add memory usage reporting to VACUUM VERBOSE |