Re: Declarative partitioning - another take

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi <rajkumar(dot)raghuwanshi(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Declarative partitioning - another take
Date: 2016-11-01 18:36:39
Message-ID: CADkLM=eW7VFXZDL5S6AqRoAW7gV24gU-q3EhNCpA682Nn3xmHg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 2:24 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> Well, I'm not sure we've exactly reached consensus here, and you're
> making me feel like I just kicked a puppy.
>

It was hyperbole. I hope you found it as funny to read as I did to write.
This is a great feature and I'm not going to make "perfect" the enemy of
"good".

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2016-11-01 18:42:50 Re: DROP FUNCTION of multiple functions
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-11-01 18:24:43 Re: Declarative partitioning - another take