Re: \timing interval

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Gerdan Santos <gerdan(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: \timing interval
Date: 2016-09-01 18:38:17
Message-ID: CADkLM=dV2ZuzfW0OCG48ucdYdWP8sF4GZ_QDeB-jouFcrYjRUg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Sep 1, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:

> I wrote:
> > So for clarity's sake: first suitable format among these:
>
> > Time: 59.999 ms
> > Time: 121.999 ms (2:01.999)
> > Time: 10921.999 ms (3:02:01.999)
> > Time: 356521.999 ms (4 3:02:01.999)
>
> Sorry, that probably added no clarity at all, I was confusing
> seconds with milliseconds in the example values :-(
>
> regards, tom lane
>

I didn't scan your examples for correctness, but the parentheticals matched
my own idea for what "left-trimmed" meant.

I'm going to hold off a bit to see if anybody else chimes in, and if not
I'm going to deliver a patch.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2016-09-01 18:38:49 Re: autonomous transactions
Previous Message Joel Jacobson 2016-09-01 18:35:13 Re: autonomous transactions