Re: \timing interval

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gerdan Santos <gerdan(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, hubert depesz lubaczewski <depesz(at)depesz(dot)com>
Subject: Re: \timing interval
Date: 2016-09-07 21:17:37
Message-ID: CADkLM=dMJ_ZvwZ1w1AEYqugr9M85JKQdnQRQ6FaFPFqkc+JrkQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> ... and it would probably greatly reduce the amount of mailing list
> traffic asking for version if nothing else.

That was the major reason for wanting it.
The second is that if an explain were posted to a forum like stackexchange,
the reader wouldn't have to wonder what version produced the plan.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Geoghegan 2016-09-07 21:27:23 Re: Is tuplesort_heap_siftup() a misnomer?
Previous Message Jim Nasby 2016-09-07 21:13:18 Re: \timing interval