Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, mkellycs(at)gmail(dot)com, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [POC] FETCH limited by bytes.
Date: 2015-12-23 18:15:36
Message-ID: CADkLM=dDy9GTf03G5t+FVshj584K5bahdZWVKbGnR==iCC1qng@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Dec 23, 2015 at 8:43 AM, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
> wrote:
> > Attached is the patch / diff against current master.
>
> I have moved this patch to next CF, there is a new patch, but no reviews.
> --
> Michael
>

That's fair. I'm still at a loss for how to show that the fetch size was
respected by the remote server, suggestions welcome!

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2015-12-23 18:16:55 Parallel pg_dump's error reporting doesn't work worth squat
Previous Message Robert Haas 2015-12-23 18:12:48 Re: Parallel Aggregate