Re: asynchronous execution

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com, amitdkhan(dot)pg(at)gmail(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: asynchronous execution
Date: 2017-03-13 05:06:23
Message-ID: CADkLM=dCp=JRAjiC5bcH2c5Ug3EOMrdDs+CiyZjogOHkHCfH8Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
>
> I think it will, because Append itself has been made async-capable by one
> of the patches and UNION ALL uses Append. But as mentioned above, only
> the postgres_fdw foreign tables will be able to utilize this for now.
>
>
Ok, I'll re-run my test from a few weeks back and see if anything has
changed.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neha Khatri 2017-03-13 05:07:43 Re: [NOVICE] Why is there a doubtful copyObject call in add_vars_to_targetlist
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-03-13 04:52:30 Re: [NOVICE] Why is there a doubtful copyObject call in add_vars_to_targetlist