Re: SQL:2011 application time

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Paul Jungwirth <pj(at)illuminatedcomputing(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>
Subject: Re: SQL:2011 application time
Date: 2023-09-01 04:02:09
Message-ID: CADkLM=curWwtENKKQ=fr+sWqn7odPvBi_PtGXSGga3hbptWOrQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> The PERIOD patch is not finished and includes some deliberately-failing
> tests. I did make some progress here finishing ALTER TABLE ADD PERIOD.
>

If it's ok with you, I need PERIODs for System Versioning, and planned on
developing a highly similar version, albeit closer to the standard. It
shouldn't interfere with your work as you're heavily leveraging range
types.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dilip Kumar 2023-09-01 04:17:53 Re: [PoC] pg_upgrade: allow to upgrade publisher node
Previous Message Andy Fan 2023-09-01 03:09:22 Re: Extract numeric filed in JSONB more effectively