Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-13 22:48:46
Message-ID: CADkLM=crHknoj0ufig-jmHkeLTU6qz7u8NJgoePMhyVfCkHPQw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Yeah, back at the beginning of this exercise, Alvaro wondered aloud
> if we should go to something other than tables altogether. I dunno
> what that'd look like though.
>

It would probably look like our acronyms and glossary pages.

Maybe the return example and return values get replaced with a
programlisting?

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-13 22:51:33 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2020-04-13 22:44:36 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?