Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Jonathan S(dot) Katz" <jkatz(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Date: 2020-04-13 22:38:23
Message-ID: CADkLM=coAan0P0o0_UJy7o2qMf3FagkLHtdc+ry=M7Nq2FDiEw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> Thinking out loud, it'd also be great if we could add in some anchors as
> well, so perhaps in the future on the pgweb side we could add in some
> discoverable links that other documentation has -- which in turn people
> could click / link to others directly to the function name.
>

+1

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2020-04-13 22:44:36 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?
Previous Message Jonathan S. Katz 2020-04-13 22:33:58 Re: Poll: are people okay with function/operator table redesign?