Re: test runner (was Re: SQL-standard function body)

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: test runner (was Re: SQL-standard function body)
Date: 2021-04-11 20:54:17
Message-ID: CADkLM=cnxf+iBPd_do2+vNtKffVb3eWwnVH8kJAesugbAEF8zg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> > This is nice. Are there any parallelism capabilities?
>
> Yes. It defaults to number-of-cores processes, but obviously can also be
> specified explicitly. One very nice part about it is that it'd work
> largely the same on windows (which has practically unusable testing
> right now). It probably doesn't yet, because I just tried to get it
> build and run tests at all, but it shouldn't be a lot of additional
> work.
>

The pidgin developers speak very highly of meson, for the same reasons
already mentioned in this thread.

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2021-04-11 21:20:35 Re: ALTER TABLE .. DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Previous Message Zhihong Yu 2021-04-11 19:57:32 Re: Have I found an interval arithmetic bug?