| From: | Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
| Cc: | Chao Li <li(dot)evan(dot)chao(at)gmail(dot)com>, jian he <jian(dot)universality(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org, tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us |
| Subject: | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. |
| Date: | 2025-11-26 05:32:49 |
| Message-ID: | CADkLM=cmTTq-+ZLi+wz5NP6_vccDMqhvMAqJ58PBz6RgMJWttQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Finally, the consts are non-appealing for me for functions that are
> internally used in these files.
I'm curious why you find them non-appealing for non-exposed functions, if
you have time to elaborate.
> And forgot one:
> valid_subsequent_attnum()'s duplication is actually adapted IMO, the
> argument lists could have different assumptions depending on the type
> of extended stats we are dealing with.
Yeah, I saw that, reviewing the diff-of-diffs just now.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Corey Huinker | 2025-11-26 05:34:56 | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. |
| Previous Message | Michael Paquier | 2025-11-26 05:24:30 | Re: Extended Statistics set/restore/clear functions. |