Re: Add A Glossary

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jürgen Purtz <juergen(at)purtz(dot)de>
Cc: Roger Harkavy <rogerharkavy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Subject: Re: Add A Glossary
Date: 2020-03-11 17:36:08
Message-ID: CADkLM=ccm90nFNqhfAJ5FtpXbDULDktZLTJcQALmwJ2__AjKqg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers

>
>
> * Transaction - yes, all those things could be "visible" or they could be
> "side effects". It may be best to leave the over-simplified definition in
> place, and add a "For more information see <<linref to
> tutorial-transactions>>
>

transaction-iso would be a better linkref in this case

In response to

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message PG Doc comments form 2020-03-12 05:58:02 optionally schema-qualified for table_name
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2020-03-11 17:23:57 Re: Add A Glossary

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2020-03-11 18:01:45 Re: User and Logical Replication
Previous Message Corey Huinker 2020-03-11 17:23:57 Re: Add A Glossary