Re: Error-safe user functions

On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 11:17 AM Amul Sul <sulamul(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:

> On Fri, Dec 9, 2022 at 9:08 PM Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2022-12-09 Fr 10:16, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> > >> On 2022-12-08 Th 21:59, Tom Lane wrote:
> > >>> Yeah, I was planning to take a look at that before walking away from
> > >>> this stuff. (I'm sure not volunteering to convert ALL the input
> > >>> functions, but I'll do the datetime code.)
> > >> Awesome. Perhaps if there are no more comments you can commit what you
> > >> currently have so people can start work on other input functions.
> > > Pushed.
> >
> >
> > Great!
> >
> >
> > > As I said, I'll take a look at the datetime area. Do we
> > > have any volunteers for other input functions?
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > I am currently looking at the json types. I think that will be enough to
> > let us rework the sql/json patches as discussed a couple of months ago.
> >
>
> I will pick a few other input functions, thanks.
>
> Regards,
> Amul
>

I can do a few as well, as I need them done for the CAST With Default
effort.

Amul, please let me know which ones you pick so we don't duplicate work.