Re: BUG #19715: pg_restore_attribute_stats() rejects range statistics for a domain over int4multirange

From: Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>
Cc: imchifan(at)163(dot)com, pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #19715: pg_restore_attribute_stats() rejects range statistics for a domain over int4multirange
Date: 2026-09-24 06:34:36
Message-ID: CADkLM=c9SGoUrEgFcUFQTRERcWNOJ8ksTm5X31sr=gyLge0zUw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

>
> As for test cases, mine are based on the existing "are foo_clone stats a
> faithful copy of foo stats" tests, rather than hardcoding stats. My way
> feels more future proof, but the future in which the hardcoded way breaks
> is a long way off.
>

Nevermind, I see that you did the clone tests as well.

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bharath Rupireddy 2026-09-24 06:34:58 Re: autovacuum: automatically propagate updated parameters
Previous Message Kirill Reshke 2026-09-24 06:22:32 Re: BUG #19705: One NaN box makes a BRIN box_inclusion_ops index omit unrelated rows